Wednesday, April 9. 2008Web Apps, Desktops and mass adoptionTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
if the software is free, even with 6 months, you still get more than you pay for! So 'sensible' is a relative qualifier here. The brigade you pejoratively refer to is a highly mobile, flexible early adopter workforce. Broadstuff hardly suffered from being booted off Facebook, did it? So why is it a cautionary tale?
Flexibility in this case means having fallbacks and distributing the risk. You were hedged - you had this site, and you had Facebook. A key issue emerges if you take your points even further: portability. In this case, portability allows the user flexibility to backup and move to rivals (assuming the hypercompetitive, many-rivals situation so common on the web also applies to the virtualised application hosting platform market - and with google already butting heads with amazon and joyent, it's sure to be - if our sites are portable (a few clicks to package it up with all the config files and port it to a rival without too much hassle) then the risk, for us web natives at least, is relatively low given the considerable benefits of these services. Portability, backups and interoperability - given their relevance to risk, which I assume businesses are very sensitive to (haven't bin there, dun that...) - raises very interesting possibilities for freemium business models.
Phil, you answer your question in Para 1 with the first line in para 2 re hedging (aka risk management)!
App Portability is a good point, and its an ommission in my post, but - if you take the Facebook eg - they just closed us down, no warnings - we would not have had a chance to port unless we had everything in backup and ready to move at the drop of a hat. The issue is risk, especially if you are doing things that are time or money sensitive (like running a company while working on a client site for example ) where you can't guarantee internet access or service availability
so there's big business out there for a meta-cloud 'offsite backup' services that not only back up your site/app/blog/online docs, but powers portability by plugging into a number of services and enables you to inject your data straight into it with minimal downtime.
I think we're inexorably headed into the cloud - I'm not convinced even cautions like this one outweigh the benefits as they stand, and they can certainly be solved, if things evolve correctly. cloud utopia?
"so there's big business out there for a meta-cloud 'offsite backup' services that not only back up your site/app/blog/online docs, but powers portability by plugging into a number of services and enables you to inject your data straight into it with minimal downtime."
I think there is, big-time! And imagine if it also heddged over a number of comms link options.
sure... why not sneakernet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sneakernet) and IPoAC (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers)...
high bandwidth!
I'm sure I still have the models for the London Scooternet Ring somewhere
|
QuicksearchMore Broad StuffFor More Information about Broadsight:
Contact us Broadsight website Articles To sign up for Broadstuff on other services: Broadstuff - the Twitter edition Broadstuff - the Jaiku edition Broadstuff - the FriendFeed edition Subscribe to Broadstuff via email Books we are reading: Poll of the WeekWill Augmented reality just be a flash in the pan?
Archives Alan Patrick (@freecloud) 's Twitter FeedPopular Entries
Categories
Creative Commons LicenceBlog Administration |