Tuesday, February 24. 2009Do Social Networks Infantilise kids' minds?Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
It's not just the new media crowd weighing in. Ben Goldacre:
http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-evidence-aric-sigman-ignored/ "We are all free to have fanciful ideas. Professor Greenfield’s stated aim, however, is to improve the public’s understanding of science: and yet repeatedly she appears in the media making wild headline-grabbing claims, without evidence, all the while telling us repeatedly that she is a scientist." If we're going to have a proper debate, we need something a bit more sensible than shouting "INTERNET EATS BRAINS" from newspaper front pages.
If you read the transcript of Susan Greenfield's statement to the House of Lords on the 12 February, you'll notice one thing: a lot of anecdotes but no reference to actual evidence or studies. I think it's worth asking the question whether social networking or computer use can affect development but she went a lot further than that in the statement, apparently without any evidence to back it up beyond the opinion of a teacher of 30 years' standing.
Scientists are people. They tend to go off on one just like anybody else. In Jim Watson's case, disastrously. That's why it's not enough just to say "Greenfield has a pedigree" and give her a free pass. If hackdom and new meeja is going to report science well, it means challenging pseudoscience wherever it pops up. |
QuicksearchMore Broad StuffFor More Information about Broadsight:
Contact us Broadsight website Articles To sign up for Broadstuff on other services: Broadstuff - the Twitter edition Broadstuff - the Jaiku edition Broadstuff - the FriendFeed edition Subscribe to Broadstuff via email Books we are reading: Alan Patrick (@freecloud) 's Twitter FeedPoll of the WeekWill Social Media penetrate Enterprises in 2009/10?
Archives Categories
Creative Commons LicenceBlog Administration |